Apple M1 Max vs FX-4350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4350
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
2.17
Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2060 Watt
14.43
+565%

Apple M1 Max outperforms FX-4350 by a whopping 565% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4350 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1874523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency1.58no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4350 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads410
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cacheno data2.9 MB
L2 cache4096 KB28 MB
L3 cacheno data48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.275 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4350 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4350 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4350 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4350 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4350 and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4350 2.17
Apple M1 Max 14.43
+565%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4350 3314
Apple M1 Max 22076
+566%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.17 14.43
Recency 29 April 2013 18 October 2021
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 10
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 2060 Watt

FX-4350 has 1548% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has a 565% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4350 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4350 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4350
FX-4350
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 545 votes

Rate FX-4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 681 vote

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4350 or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.