Turion 64 MT-30 vs FX-4320
Aggregate performance score
FX-4320 outperforms Turion 64 MT-30 by a whopping 1000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing FX-4320 and Turion 64 MT-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1927 | 3248 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 1.97 | 0.68 |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | March 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-4320 and Turion 64 MT-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4320 and Turion 64 MT-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and Turion 64 MT-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and Turion 64 MT-30 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and Turion 64 MT-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and Turion 64 MT-30.
| PCIe version | Not Listed | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.98 | 0.18 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 25 Watt |
FX-4320 has a 1000% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 MT-30, on the other hand, has 280% lower power consumption.
The FX-4320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-30 in performance tests.
Note that FX-4320 is a desktop processor while Turion 64 MT-30 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and Turion 64 MT-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
