i5-520E vs FX-4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4300 and Core i5-520E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1971not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency1.87no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122$210

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4300 and Core i5-520E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data18
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and Core i5-520E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Core i5-520E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

FX-4300 and Core i5-520E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Core i5-520E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Core i5-520E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Core i5-520E.

PCIe versionn/a2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 7 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-4300 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores.

i5-520E, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-4300 and Core i5-520E. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4300 is a desktop processor while Core i5-520E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Core i5-520E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4300
FX-4300
Intel Core i5-520E
Core i5-520E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1723 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-520E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4300 or Core i5-520E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.