Ultra 7 268V vs FX-4170

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4170
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.95
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
15.37
+688%

Core Ultra 7 268V outperforms FX-4170 by a whopping 688% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4170 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1958463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.4583.97
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4170 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache192 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4170 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4170 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

FX-4170 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4170 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4170 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4170 and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 15.37
Recency 27 February 2012 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 268V has a 688.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 635.3% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4170 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4170 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 268V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4170 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4170
FX-4170
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 78 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4170 or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.