Celeron M 360 vs FX-4130

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4130
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.70
+1114%
Celeron M 360
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.14

FX-4130 outperforms Celeron M 360 by a whopping 1114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4130 and Celeron M 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20583334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency1.290.63
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date27 August 2012 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$112no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4130 and Celeron M 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on FX-4130 and Celeron M 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4130 and Celeron M 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-4130 and Celeron M 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4130 and Celeron M 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4130 and Celeron M 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4130 and Celeron M 360.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4130 1.70
+1114%
Celeron M 360 0.14

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4130 2696
+1120%
Celeron M 360 221

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.70 0.14
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 21 Watt

FX-4130 has a 1114.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 360, on the other hand, has 495.2% lower power consumption.

The FX-4130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 360 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4130 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4130 and Celeron M 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4130
FX-4130
Intel Celeron M 360
Celeron M 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 174 votes

Rate FX-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4130 or Celeron M 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.