Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs FX-4130

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4130
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.70
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
2021
8 cores / 8 threads, 2060 Watt
10.86
+539%

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms FX-4130 by a whopping 539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4130 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2043712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.23no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency1.28no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)no data
Release date27 August 2012 (12 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$112no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4130 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 cache4096 KB28 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4130 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4130 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4130 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4130 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4130 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4130 1.70
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 10.86
+539%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4130 2696
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 17192
+538%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.70 10.86
Recency 27 August 2012 18 October 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 2060 Watt

FX-4130 has 1548% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, on the other hand, has a 538.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4130 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4130 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4130 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4130
FX-4130
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
M1 Pro 8-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 173 votes

Rate FX-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 102 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro 8-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4130 or Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.