Atom E625CT vs FX-4120
Primary details
Comparing FX-4120 and Atom E625CT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Stellarton (2010) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 22 November 2010 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-4120 and Atom E625CT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 0.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 26 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4120 and Atom E625CT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | Intel BGA1466 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4120 and Atom E625CT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4120 and Atom E625CT are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4120 and Atom E625CT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel GMA 600 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4120 and Atom E625CT.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 22 November 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 3 Watt |
FX-4120 has an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom E625CT, on the other hand, has 3066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-4120 and Atom E625CT. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-4120 is a desktop processor while Atom E625CT is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4120 and Atom E625CT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
