Atom N280 vs FX-4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Atom N280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2069not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.64no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)1 February 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Atom N280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data666.66 MT/s
Multiplierno data10
L1 cache192 KB56 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Atom N280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Atom N280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

FX-4100 and Atom N280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Atom N280 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Atom N280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Atom N280.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4100 2618
+1568%
Atom N280 157

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 1 February 2009
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 2 Watt

FX-4100 has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N280, on the other hand, has 4650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-4100 and Atom N280. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Atom N280 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Atom N280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
Intel Atom N280
Atom N280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 887 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 30 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Atom N280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.