Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P
Primary details
Comparing EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (1 year ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 2x 73 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,750 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP6 | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Radeon 8060S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 16 |
| Threads | 48 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 55 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 8224P has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 190.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 8224P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
