Xeon 6780E vs EPYC Embedded 3401
Primary details
Comparing EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 144 |
| Threads | 16 | 144 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.85 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 18.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1536 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 108 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9600 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | no data | 4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 330 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 144 |
| Threads | 16 | 144 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 330 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3401 has 288.2% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 800% more physical cores and 800% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC Embedded 3401 and Xeon 6780E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
