Xeon w9-3575X vs EPYC Embedded 3301

Primary details

Comparing EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated30
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.99
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYC Embeddedno data
Power efficiencyno data14.47
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)44
Threads1288
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache1152 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB97.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size213 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors9600 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 24 August 2024
Physical cores 12 44
Threads 12 88
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 340 Watt

EPYC Embedded 3301 has 423.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and 266.7% more physical cores and 633.3% more threads.

We couldn't decide between EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC Embedded 3301
EPYC Embedded 3301
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC Embedded 3301 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.