Xeon w9-3595X vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+0.5%
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
62.95

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0920.42
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency16.6215.47
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3595X has 1773% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12860 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads256120
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size8x 73 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+0.5%
Xeon w9-3595X 62.95

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+0.5%
Xeon w9-3595X 99993

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 62.95
Recency 13 June 2023 24 August 2024
Physical cores 128 60
Threads 256 120
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 385 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score, 113.3% more physical cores and 113.3% more threads, and 6.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 vote

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.