Xeon W-2195 vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
65.64
+259%

EPYC 9754 outperforms Xeon W-2195 by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-2195 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.037.12
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency16.6311.92
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)29 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$2,553

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-2195 has 591% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-2195 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12818 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads25636
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1.125 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)18 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-2195 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP5Socket R4
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-2195. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-2195 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-2195 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-2195. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data512 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-2195.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 65.64
+259%
Xeon W-2195 18.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+259%
Xeon W-2195 28005

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.64 18.30
Recency 13 June 2023 29 August 2017
Physical cores 128 18
Threads 256 36
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 140 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 258.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 611.1% more physical cores and 611.1% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon W-2195, on the other hand, has 157.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2195 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-2195, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Xeon W-2195
Xeon W-2195

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 36 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon W-2195 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Xeon W-2195, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.