Xeon Platinum 8362 vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+1004%
Xeon Platinum 8362
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 265 Watt
5.73

EPYC 9754 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8362 by a whopping 1004% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8362 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking121135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.09no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency16.622.05
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8362 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12832 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads25664
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm10 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8362 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt265 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8362. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8362 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8362 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8362. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8362.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+1004%
Xeon Platinum 8362 5.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+1003%
Xeon Platinum 8362 9107

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 5.73
Recency 13 June 2023 6 April 2021
Physical cores 128 32
Threads 256 64
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 265 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 1003.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Platinum 8362, on the other hand, has 35.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8362 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8362, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Xeon Platinum 8362
Xeon Platinum 8362

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8362 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Xeon Platinum 8362, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.