Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
65.64
+583%

EPYC 9754 outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 by a whopping 583% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11815
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.07no data
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataXeon
Power efficiency16.637.30
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12812 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads25624
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3072 KB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography5 nm22 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2356 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors71,000 million5,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5LGA2011-3
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon E5-2678 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9754 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon E5-2678 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon E5-2678 v3.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes12840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 65.64
+583%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 9.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+583%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 14712

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.64 9.61
Physical cores 128 12
Threads 256 24
Chip lithography 5 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 583% higher aggregate performance score, 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2678 v3, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2678 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Xeon E5-2678 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
Xeon E5-2678 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 36 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2374 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2678 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Xeon E5-2678 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.