Ryzen 5 7600 vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+271%
Ryzen 5 7600
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.06

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen 5 7600 by a whopping 271% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0955.04
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency16.6124.82
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)14 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 7600 has 4950% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1286 (Hexa-Core)
Threads25612
Base clock speed2.25 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size8x 73 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors71,000 millionCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7600.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+271%
Ryzen 5 7600 17.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+271%
Ryzen 5 7600 27099

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 9754 1603
Ryzen 5 7600 2747
+71.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 9754 15552
+27.2%
Ryzen 5 7600 12226

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 17.06
Recency 13 June 2023 14 January 2023
Physical cores 128 6
Threads 256 12
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 270.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 2033.3% more physical cores and 2033.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7600, on the other hand, has 453.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Ryzen 5 7600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1273 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Ryzen 5 7600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.