Processor 300 vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+1302%
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51

EPYC 9754 outperforms Processor 300 by a whopping 1302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking121319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.09no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency16.619.27
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1282 (Dual-core)
Threads2564
Base clock speed2.25 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm10 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2163 mm2
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP51700
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9754 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Processor 300.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+1302%
Processor 300 4.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+1303%
Processor 300 7160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 4.51
Recency 13 June 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 128 2
Threads 256 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 46 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 1302.2% higher aggregate performance score, 6300% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 682.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.