EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
67.96
+7.5%

EPYC 9634 outperforms EPYC 9754 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.092.11
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.6222.18
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$10,304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9634 has 94% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12884
Threads256168
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.25 GHz
Multiplierno data22.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)5376 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)84 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 73 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors71,000 million78,840 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9634.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
EPYC 9634 67.96
+7.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
EPYC 9634 107944
+7.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 67.96
Recency 13 June 2023 10 November 2022
Physical cores 128 84
Threads 256 168
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 290 Watt

EPYC 9754 has an age advantage of 7 months, and 52.4% more physical cores and 52.4% more threads.

EPYC 9634, on the other hand, has a 7.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 24.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9634.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.