EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
60.35
EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+4.8%

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9754 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.061.09
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency16.3216.62
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Bergamo (2023)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,899$11,900

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has 1006% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9754 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)128
Threads64256
Base clock speed4 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size4x 71 mm28x 73 mm2
Number of transistors26,280 million71,000 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9754 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketsTR5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9754. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9754 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9754. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9754.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 60.35
EPYC 9754 63.24
+4.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 95865
EPYC 9754 100460
+4.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.35 63.24
Recency 19 October 2023 13 June 2023
Physical cores 32 128
Threads 64 256
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has an age advantage of 4 months, and 2.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9754, on the other hand, has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9754.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9754, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 18 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX or EPYC 9754, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.