Atom x7835RE vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+1095%
Atom x7835RE
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 12 Watt
5.29

EPYC 9754 outperforms Atom x7835RE by a whopping 1095% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Atom x7835RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking121188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.09no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency16.6241.72
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$127

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Atom x7835RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1288 (Octa-Core)
Threads2568
Base clock speed2.25 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per module)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm10 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Atom x7835RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Atom x7835RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Atom x7835RE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Atom x7835RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 32EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Atom x7835RE.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes1289

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+1095%
Atom x7835RE 5.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+1096%
Atom x7835RE 8400

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 5.29
Recency 13 June 2023 8 April 2024
Physical cores 128 8
Threads 256 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 12 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 1095.5% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Atom x7835RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 2900% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7835RE in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7835RE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Atom x7835RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Atom x7835RE
Atom x7835RE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7835RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Atom x7835RE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.