Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+145%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.86

EPYC 9754 outperforms Apple M3 Max 16-Core by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and M3 Max 16-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.09no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M3
Power efficiency16.6131.36
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)no data
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and M3 Max 16-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12816 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads25616
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.06 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm3 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Number of transistors71,000 million92000 Million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and M3 Max 16-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and M3 Max 16-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and M3 Max 16-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and M3 Max 16-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and M3 Max 16-Core.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+145%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+145%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41076

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 25.86
Recency 13 June 2023 30 October 2023
Physical cores 128 16
Threads 256 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 78 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 144.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 361.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the M3 Max 16-Core in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Apple M3 Max 16-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 276 votes

Rate M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or M3 Max 16-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.