Xeon Platinum 8280L vs EPYC 9684X
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 5 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
Power efficiency | 17.89 | no data |
Architecture codename | Genoa-X (2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
Release date | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $14,756 | $17,906 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 96 | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
Threads | 192 | 56 |
Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz |
Multiplier | no data | 27 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1.75 MB |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 28 MB |
L3 cache | 1152 MB (shared) | 38.5 MB |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 12x 72 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 84 °C |
Number of transistors | 135,240 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | SP5 | FCLGA3647 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2933 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4.5 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 140.8 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L.
PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 13 June 2023 | 2 April 2019 |
Physical cores | 96 | 28 |
Threads | 192 | 56 |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 205 Watt |
EPYC 9684X has an age advantage of 4 years, 242.9% more physical cores and 242.9% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon Platinum 8280L, on the other hand, has 95.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9684X and Xeon Platinum 8280L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.