Xeon Gold 6338 vs EPYC 9684X

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9684X
2023
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
78.91
+257%

EPYC 9684X outperforms Xeon Gold 6338 by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9684X and Xeon Gold 6338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency17.999.83
Architecture codenameGenoa-X (2023)no data
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,756no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9684X and Xeon Gold 6338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9632 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads19264
Base clock speed2.55 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache1152 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography5 nm10 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Number of transistors135,240 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9684X and Xeon Gold 6338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9684X and Xeon Gold 6338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9684X and Xeon Gold 6338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9684X and Xeon Gold 6338 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9684X and Xeon Gold 6338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9684X and Xeon Gold 6338.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9684X 78.91
+257%
Xeon Gold 6338 22.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9684X 120760
+257%
Xeon Gold 6338 33814

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 78.91 22.10
Recency 13 June 2023 1 April 2021
Physical cores 96 32
Threads 192 64
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 9684X has a 257.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Gold 6338, on the other hand, has 95.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9684X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6338 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9684X and Xeon Gold 6338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9684X
EPYC 9684X
Intel Xeon Gold 6338
Xeon Gold 6338

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 9684X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9684X or Xeon Gold 6338, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.