3015e vs EPYC 9684X

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9684X
2023
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
75.79
+4411%

EPYC 9684X outperforms 3015e by a whopping 4411% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9684X and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking62068
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency17.9426.52
Architecture codenameGenoa-X (2023)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,756no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9684X and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores962 (Dual-core)
Threads1924
Base clock speed2.55 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache1152 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors135,240 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9684X and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5FT5
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9684X and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9684X and 3015e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9684X and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9684X and 3015e.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9684X 75.79
+4411%
3015e 1.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9684X 120760
+4411%
3015e 2677

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 9684X 2068
+287%
3015e 535

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 9684X 21442
+2113%
3015e 969

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 75.79 1.68
Recency 13 June 2023 4 August 2020
Physical cores 96 2
Threads 192 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 9684X has a 4411.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 4700% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

3015e, on the other hand, has 6566.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9684X is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9684X is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9684X and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9684X
EPYC 9684X
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 29 votes

Rate EPYC 9684X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 30 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9684X or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.