Xeon w7-2475X vs EPYC 9654P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
72.13
+109%
Xeon w7-2475X
2023
20 cores / 40 threads, 225 Watt
34.48

EPYC 9654P outperforms Xeon w7-2475X by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654P and Xeon w7-2475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.0158.01
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.9614.50
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,625$1,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w7-2475X has 2786% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654P and Xeon w7-2475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9620 (Icosa-Core)
Threads19240
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache6 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache96 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654P and Xeon w7-2475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654P and Xeon w7-2475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9654P and Xeon w7-2475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654P and Xeon w7-2475X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654P and Xeon w7-2475X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TiB2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654P and Xeon w7-2475X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654P 72.13
+109%
Xeon w7-2475X 34.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9654P 114570
+109%
Xeon w7-2475X 54769

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 72.13 34.48
Recency 10 November 2022 15 February 2023
Physical cores 96 20
Threads 192 40
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 9654P has a 109.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 380% more physical cores and 380% more threads.

Xeon w7-2475X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 60% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon w7-2475X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654P and Xeon w7-2475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P
Intel Xeon w7-2475X
Xeon w7-2475X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon w7-2475X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654P or Xeon w7-2475X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.