EPYC 4244P vs EPYC 9654

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.70
+337%
EPYC 4244P
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.31

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 4244P by a whopping 337% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654 and EPYC 4244P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3656.10
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.9025.20
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,805$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4244P has 4025% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654 and EPYC 4244P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores966 (Hexa-Core)
Threads19212
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache6 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache96 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size12x 72 mm271 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors78,840 million6,570 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654 and EPYC 4244P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654 and EPYC 4244P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654 and EPYC 4244P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654 and EPYC 4244P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654 and EPYC 4244P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654 75.70
+337%
EPYC 4244P 17.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9654 120246
+337%
EPYC 4244P 27492

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 75.70 17.31
Recency 10 November 2022 21 May 2024
Physical cores 96 6
Threads 192 12
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 9654 has a 337.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

EPYC 4244P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 453.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4244P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654 and EPYC 4244P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654
AMD EPYC 4244P
EPYC 4244P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate EPYC 4244P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654 or EPYC 4244P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.