EPYC 9734 vs EPYC 9534

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9534 and EPYC 9734 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.72no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.98no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Bergamo (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,803$9,600

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9534 and EPYC 9734 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)112
Threads128224
Base clock speed2.45 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier24.5no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size8x 72 mm28x 73 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million71,000 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9534 and EPYC 9734 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9534 and EPYC 9734. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9534 and EPYC 9734 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9534 and EPYC 9734. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9534 and EPYC 9734.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2022 13 June 2023
Physical cores 64 112
Threads 128 224
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 340 Watt

EPYC 9534 has 21.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9734, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9534 and EPYC 9734. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9534 and EPYC 9734, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9534
EPYC 9534
AMD EPYC 9734
EPYC 9734

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9534 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9734 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9534 or EPYC 9734, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.