Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs EPYC 9474F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
+29.6%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 350 Watt
51.03

EPYC 9474F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.5816.73
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.3813.80
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Storm Peak (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,780$2,649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has 200% better value for money than EPYC 9474F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads9648
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache3 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache48 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size8x 72 mm24x 71 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9474F 66.11
+29.6%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 51.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9474F 105010
+29.6%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 81055

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 66.11 51.03
Recency 10 November 2022 19 October 2023
Physical cores 48 24
Threads 96 48
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 9474F has a 29.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 2.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9474F or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.