EPYC 4584PX vs EPYC 9474F

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
+75.8%
EPYC 4584PX
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
37.61

EPYC 9474F outperforms EPYC 4584PX by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9474F and EPYC 4584PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.5854.13
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.3829.66
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,780$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4584PX has 870% better value for money than EPYC 9474F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9474F and EPYC 4584PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads9632
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.7 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache3 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache48 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size8x 72 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors52,560 million17,840 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9474F and EPYC 4584PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9474F and EPYC 4584PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9474F and EPYC 4584PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9474F and EPYC 4584PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9474F and EPYC 4584PX.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9474F 66.11
+75.8%
EPYC 4584PX 37.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9474F 105010
+75.8%
EPYC 4584PX 59735

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 66.11 37.61
Recency 10 November 2022 21 May 2024
Physical cores 48 16
Threads 96 32
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 9474F has a 75.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

EPYC 4584PX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4584PX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9474F and EPYC 4584PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F
AMD EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate EPYC 4584PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9474F or EPYC 4584PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.