Xeon w9-3475X vs EPYC 9334

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9334
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 210 Watt
40.82
Xeon w9-3475X
2023
36 cores / 72 threads, 300 Watt
41.18
+0.9%

Xeon w9-3475X outperforms EPYC 9334 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.5227.39
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.4012.99
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,990$3,739

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3475X has 138% better value for money than EPYC 9334.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)36
Threads6472
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache2 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)82.5 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 72 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9334 40.82
Xeon w9-3475X 41.18
+0.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9334 64841
Xeon w9-3475X 65413
+0.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.82 41.18
Recency 10 November 2022 15 February 2023
Physical cores 32 36
Threads 64 72
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 300 Watt

EPYC 9334 has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3475X, on the other hand, has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 12.5% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9334 and Xeon w9-3475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9334
EPYC 9334
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
Xeon w9-3475X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 12 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3475X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9334 or Xeon w9-3475X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.