Xeon Gold 5515+ vs EPYC 9274F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
47.50
+187%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Xeon Gold 5515+ by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 5515+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking40399
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.73no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,060no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 5515+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed4.05 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.05 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier40.5no data
L1 cache1536 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)22.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm10 nm
Die size8x 72 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 5515+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP54677
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 5515+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 5515+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 5515+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 5515+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 5515+.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9274F 47.50
+187%
Xeon Gold 5515+ 16.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9274F 73463
+187%
Xeon Gold 5515+ 25587

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.50 16.54
Recency 10 November 2022 14 December 2023
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 165 Watt

EPYC 9274F has a 187.2% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Gold 5515+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 93.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9274F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5515+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 5515+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F
Intel Xeon Gold 5515+
Xeon Gold 5515+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5515 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9274F or Xeon Gold 5515+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.