Xeon w5-2545 vs EPYC 8434P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8434P
2023
48 cores / 96 threads, 200 Watt
43.45
+59.5%

EPYC 8434P outperforms Xeon w5-2545 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 8434P and Xeon w5-2545 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking56180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.1783.44
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency19.8111.83
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,700$889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w5-2545 has 534% better value for money than EPYC 8434P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8434P and Xeon w5-2545 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads9624
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C74 °C
Number of transistors35,500 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8434P and Xeon w5-2545 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8434P and Xeon w5-2545. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 8434P and Xeon w5-2545 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8434P and Xeon w5-2545 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8434P and Xeon w5-2545. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8434P and Xeon w5-2545.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes9664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 8434P 43.45
+59.5%
Xeon w5-2545 27.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 8434P 66490
+59.5%
Xeon w5-2545 41688

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.45 27.24
Recency 18 September 2023 24 August 2024
Physical cores 48 12
Threads 96 24
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 210 Watt

EPYC 8434P has a 59.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 5% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-2545, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.

The EPYC 8434P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon w5-2545 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8434P and Xeon w5-2545, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8434P
EPYC 8434P
Intel Xeon w5-2545
Xeon w5-2545

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon w5-2545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 8434P or Xeon w5-2545, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.