Ryzen 9 9900X vs EPYC 8324P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8324P
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
35.96
+4.4%
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
34.45

EPYC 8324P outperforms Ryzen 9 9900X by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking101109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.6163.19
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency18.9127.17
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)15 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,895$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 9900X has 280% better value for money than EPYC 8324P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed2.65 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size4x 73 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors35,500 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6AM5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes9624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 8324P 35.96
+4.4%
Ryzen 9 9900X 34.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 8324P 57127
+4.4%
Ryzen 9 9900X 54718

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.96 34.45
Recency 18 September 2023 15 August 2024
Physical cores 32 12
Threads 64 24
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 8324P has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 9 9900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X.

Be aware that EPYC 8324P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 9900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8324P
EPYC 8324P
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8324P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 152 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 9900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 8324P or Ryzen 9 9900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.