i7-14700 vs EPYC 8224P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8224P outperforms Core i7-14700 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 161 | 178 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 27.97 | 58.29 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 16.82 | 39.50 |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (1 year ago) | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $855 | $384 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-14700 has 108% better value for money than EPYC 8224P.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 2x 73 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,750 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP6 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.6 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 32 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.43 | 27.13 |
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 8 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 20 |
| Threads | 48 | 28 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 65 Watt |
EPYC 8224P has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads.
i7-14700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 146.2% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700.
Be aware that EPYC 8224P is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-14700 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8224P and Core i7-14700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
