Ultra 7 258V vs EPYC 8124P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8124P
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
22.88
+82.3%
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.55

EPYC 8124P outperforms Core Ultra 7 258V by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 8124P and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking228619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.17no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency17.3269.86
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$639no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8124P and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed2.45 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm3 nm
Die size2x 73 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors17,750 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8124P and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8124P and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 8124P and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8124P and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8124P and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8124P and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes964

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 8124P 22.88
+82.3%
Ultra 7 258V 12.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 8124P 36338
+82.3%
Ultra 7 258V 19937

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.88 12.55
Recency 18 September 2023 24 September 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 17 Watt

EPYC 8124P has a 82.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 635.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 8124P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 258V in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8124P is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 258V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8124P and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8124P
EPYC 8124P
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 8124P or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.