Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs EPYC 8024P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8024P
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
13.19
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
15.82
+19.9%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms EPYC 8024P by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 8024P and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking583442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.42no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency13.6152.48
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$409no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8024P and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache32 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,875 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8024P and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP6FP8
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8024P and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8024P and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8024P and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8024P and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes96no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 8024P 13.19
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 15.82
+19.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 8024P 20556
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 24659
+20%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.19 15.82
Recency 18 September 2023 1 October 2024
Threads 16 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a 19.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 0% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 221.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8024P in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8024P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8024P and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 8024P or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.