Xeon Platinum 8468 vs EPYC 7H12

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking47not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency14.82no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date18 September 2019 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,214

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads12896
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size192 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2019 10 January 2023
Physical cores 64 48
Threads 128 96
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 7H12 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8468, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8468, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Xeon Platinum 8468
Xeon Platinum 8468

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8468 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Xeon Platinum 8468, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.