Xeon Gold 6242R vs EPYC 7H12

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
43.84
+103%
Xeon Gold 6242R
2020
20 cores / 40 threads, 205 Watt
21.58

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Gold 6242R by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Gold 6242R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking48248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.04
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency14.829.96
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date18 September 2019 (5 years ago)24 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,529

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Gold 6242R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads12840
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2631
L1 cache96K (per core)1.25 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)20 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)35.75 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Gold 6242R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Gold 6242R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Gold 6242R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Gold 6242R are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Gold 6242R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size4 TiB1 TB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Gold 6242R.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 43.84
+103%
Xeon Gold 6242R 21.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7H12 69633
+103%
Xeon Gold 6242R 34282

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.84 21.58
Recency 18 September 2019 24 February 2020
Physical cores 64 20
Threads 128 40
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 7H12 has a 103.2% higher aggregate performance score, 220% more physical cores and 220% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Gold 6242R, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 36.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6242R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Gold 6242R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
Xeon Gold 6242R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 452 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6242R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Xeon Gold 6242R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.