Xeon Gold 6538N vs EPYC 7F72

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F72
2020
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
33.23
+17.1%
Xeon Gold 6538N
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
28.37

EPYC 7F72 outperforms Xeon Gold 6538N by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Gold 6538N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking119164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.0221.88
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency13.0513.04
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,450$3,351

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6538N has 118% better value for money than EPYC 7F72.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Gold 6538N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4864
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache192 MB (shared)60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size74 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Gold 6538N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Gold 6538N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Gold 6538N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Gold 6538N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Gold 6538N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Gold 6538N.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F72 33.23
+17.1%
Xeon Gold 6538N 28.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F72 52597
+17.2%
Xeon Gold 6538N 44895

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.23 28.37
Recency 14 April 2020 14 December 2023
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 48 64
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 7F72 has a 17.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon Gold 6538N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 17.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7F72 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6538N in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Gold 6538N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F72
EPYC 7F72
Intel Xeon Gold 6538N
Xeon Gold 6538N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F72 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6538N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F72 or Xeon Gold 6538N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.