Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs EPYC 7F72

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F72 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	118	293
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.19	no data
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	AMD EPYC	no data
Power efficiency	13.06	40.67
Architecture codename	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date	14 April 2020 (4 years ago)	16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,450	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F72 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	24 (Tetracosa-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	48	16
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	4 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.7 GHz	5.2 GHz
Multiplier	32	no data
L1 cache	1.5 MB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	12 MB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	192 MB (shared)	16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	7 nm, 14 nm	4 nm
Die size	74 mm2	178 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Number of transistors	3,800 million	25,000 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	no data
Unlocked multiplier	+	-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F72 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	SP3	FP7
Power consumption (TDP)	240 Watt	45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F72 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	+	+
Precision Boost 2	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F72 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F72 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-3200	DDR5
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	no data
Max memory channels	8	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.763 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F72 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

PCIe version	4.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	34.37	20.07
Recency	14 April 2020	16 April 2024
Physical cores	24	8
Threads	48	16
Chip lithography	7 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	240 Watt	45 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F72 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---