Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) vs EPYC 7F72

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F72
2020
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
33.11
+18.4%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.97

EPYC 7F72 outperforms Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F72 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking119167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.46no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M4
Power efficiency12.9982.29
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,450no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F72 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4812
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.592 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.51 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache192 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm3 nm
Die size74 mm2no data
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F72 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F72 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F72 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F72 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 16-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F72 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores).

PCIe version4.0no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.11 27.97
Recency 14 April 2020 30 October 2024
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 32 Watt

EPYC 7F72 has a 18.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7F72 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7F72 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F72 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F72
EPYC 7F72
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F72 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F72 or Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.