EPYC 7303 vs EPYC 7F52

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F52
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
25.66
+42.6%
EPYC 7303
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 130 Watt
17.99

EPYC 7F52 outperforms EPYC 7303 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 7303 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking190337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.3721.14
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency10.1113.08
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)5 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,100$604

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7303 has 294% better value for money than EPYC 7F52.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 7303 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size74 mm22x 81 mm2
Number of transistors3,800 million8,300 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 7303 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 7303. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 7303 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 7303. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 7303.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F52 25.66
+42.6%
EPYC 7303 17.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F52 40756
+42.6%
EPYC 7303 28572

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.66 17.99
Recency 14 April 2020 5 September 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 130 Watt

EPYC 7F52 has a 42.6% higher aggregate performance score.

EPYC 7303, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 84.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7303 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 7303, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52
AMD EPYC 7303
EPYC 7303

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7303 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F52 or EPYC 7303, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.