Ryzen 7 5700U vs EPYC 7F32

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
15.32
+48%

EPYC 7F32 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700U by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 5700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking475768
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.64no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency7.7662.92
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 5700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier3718
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache4 MB4 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size74 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors3,800 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 5700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FP6
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 5700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 5700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 5700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiB64 GB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 5700U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F32 15.32
+48%
Ryzen 7 5700U 10.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F32 23453
+48.1%
Ryzen 7 5700U 15840

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.32 10.35
Recency 14 April 2020 12 January 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7F32 has a 48% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 7 5700U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 1100% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7F32 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5700U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 5700U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 5700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
Ryzen 7 5700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3023 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F32 or Ryzen 7 5700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.