Celeron 6305 vs EPYC 7F32

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
15.33
+1027%

EPYC 7F32 outperforms Celeron 6305 by a whopping 1027% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4752255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.65no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency7.778.27
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Tiger Lake-U (2020)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KB160 KB
L2 cache4 MB2.5 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size74 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiB64 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305.

PCIe version4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F32 15.33
+1027%
Celeron 6305 1.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F32 23455
+1028%
Celeron 6305 2080

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.33 1.36
Recency 14 April 2020 1 September 2020
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7F32 has a 1027.2% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 6305, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 1100% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7F32 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 6305 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F32 and Celeron 6305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32
Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 147 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F32 or Celeron 6305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.