Ryzen AI Max 385 vs EPYC 7773X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI Max 385 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency19.44no data
Architecture codenameMilan-X (2022)Strix Halo (2025)
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)6 January 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI Max 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads12816
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache768 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI Max 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FP11
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI Max 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI Max 385 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI Max 385. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon 8050S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI Max 385.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2022 6 January 2025
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 55 Watt

EPYC 7773X has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen AI Max 385, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 409.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI Max 385. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max 385 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI Max 385, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
Ryzen AI Max 385

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI Max 385 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7773X or Ryzen AI Max 385, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.