Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS vs EPYC 7773X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.60
+311%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.01

EPYC 7773X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS by a whopping 311% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7773X and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency19.4737.88
Architecture codenameMilan-X (2022)Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)19 April 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7773X and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads12816
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache768 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7773X and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FP7
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7773X 57.60
+311%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS 14.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7773X 91491
+311%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS 22259

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7773X 1531
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS 1859
+21.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7773X 15277
+83.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS 8316

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.60 14.01
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7773X has a 311.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7773X and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7773X or Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.