EPYC 8324P vs EPYC 7763

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7763
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
53.23
+48%
EPYC 8324P
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
35.96

EPYC 7763 outperforms EPYC 8324P by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7763 and EPYC 8324P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.3217.51
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.9918.91
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,890$1,895

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8324P has 427% better value for money than EPYC 7763.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7763 and EPYC 8324P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2.45 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier24.5no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7763 and EPYC 8324P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3SP6
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7763 and EPYC 8324P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7763 and EPYC 8324P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7763 and EPYC 8324P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7763 and EPYC 8324P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12896

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7763 53.23
+48%
EPYC 8324P 35.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7763 84557
+48%
EPYC 8324P 57127

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.23 35.96
Recency 15 March 2021 18 September 2023
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 180 Watt

EPYC 7763 has a 48% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 8324P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 55.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8324P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7763 and EPYC 8324P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763
AMD EPYC 8324P
EPYC 8324P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1197 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8324P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7763 or EPYC 8324P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.