Ryzen AI 9 365 vs EPYC 7713

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
52.14
+192%
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
17.87

EPYC 7713 outperforms Ryzen AI 9 365 by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7713 and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.87no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency21.9360.40
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Strix Point (2024)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)July 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,060no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7713 and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads12820
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7713 and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FP8
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7713 52.14
+192%
Ryzen AI 9 365 17.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7713 82825
+192%
Ryzen AI 9 365 28388

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.14 17.87
Physical cores 64 10
Threads 128 20
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 28 Watt

EPYC 7713 has a 191.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 540% more physical cores and 540% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 703.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 365 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7713 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 365 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7713 and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 37 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7713 or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.