EPYC 9224 vs EPYC 7713

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
53.45
+94.8%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 9224 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9224 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.1012.57
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,060$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9224 has 305% better value for money than EPYC 7713.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9224 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads12848
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier2025
L1 cache4 MB1536 KB
L2 cache32 MB24 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 72 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9224 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9224. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9224 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9224. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9224.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7713 53.45
+94.8%
EPYC 9224 27.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7713 82666
+94.7%
EPYC 9224 42448

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.45 27.44
Recency 12 January 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 64 24
Threads 128 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 7713 has a 94.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

EPYC 9224, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9224 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9224, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713
AMD EPYC 9224
EPYC 9224

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9224 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7713 or EPYC 9224, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.