Threadripper PRO 7955WX vs EPYC 7702P

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking63not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.29no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.86no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Storm Peak (2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,425$1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm22x 71 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 19 October 2023
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 7702P has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 75% lower power consumption.

Threadripper PRO 7955WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7702P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7702P is a server/workstation processor while Threadripper PRO 7955WX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7702P
AMD Threadripper PRO 7955WX
Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 32 votes

Rate EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Threadripper PRO 7955WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702P or Threadripper PRO 7955WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.